Economists, sociologists – many experts – have addressed the reality of unequal outcome and the issues it fosters, and also the issues that arise when outside forces attempt to “fix” (neutralize, eliminate, re-arrange) the stratifications that continue to organically emerge in societies over time. Look up Pareto Distribution and read about it, or listen to Dr. Jordan Peterson discuss this.
Message to all “diversity” advocates out there, who are (often unwittingly) in actuality advocating for homogenization, including forced homogenization via the ever more aggressive affirmativization (inversion) of society: True and real differences, as they exist and as they are allowed to naturally and organically perpetuate themselves, form the truest reality of any society. We cannot all be neurosurgeons.
In my words….
The current climate of attack, in particular the attacks that come from the so-called Left, which work and merge to form the societal downfall of the second decade of this millennium are based on an Equal Outcome Conundrum:
Personal hurt, having been given license to be aired and used as ammunition, rationalized and fixated upon thanks to the culture of victimhood
Personal hurt, acted upon via grievance utterances, protest, negative actions, from censorship to attack, as a left- facilitated and supported (pseudo) political platform foundation and in its carrying out, as activism
Personal hurt, having been concocted and formed by notions of deprivation amidst self-centered lifestyle pursuit, furthered via pervasive and relentless broadcasting (tech and social media facilitated) of identic (selfish) pursuits of fun (where happiness is distorted and confused with varying types of so-called fun), superficalised and steeped in competitive climates thanks to continued over-sharing of what is only and erroneously perceived to be its successful attainment, with no regard for others to whom anyone is obligated, in particular to dependants (offspring)
This is a period in which purely personal revenge agendas lie at the root of all that drives and comprises leftist activism. It is victimhood, politicized.
The revenge-based climate exists due to the conundrum that is the Fate of the Individual: Never are all equal recipients of anything. This conundrum is based on the fallacy that is the believed in and supported by the Left, that all should always should be equal recipients and benefiticaries of everything. This conundrum is founded, fomented, supported and rationalized via Leftist equal outcome ideology, being against Nature and all her Laws.
The repercussions of forced equality of outcome: Aggressive affirmative societal re-configuring, founded on the Left’s reparations ideology and championing of mediocrity, inverted success ideation and mass appeasement, fails and dilutes society by destroying and undermining all bio- and socio- structures of competition and achievement. It also foments resentment in its recipients, who, having gained nothing psychically from un-earned largesse, act out against their charitable sources, “biting the hand that feeds them,” because these confused humans are not biologically wired to want the forced elevation to begin with, but are made to think they believe this, having been programmed by Leftist ideology to expect equal outcome as an inherent right, to be gifted if it is not earned.
Is the blanket attack on first-world men a tactic of the victim culture strategy? Does this leave off where the restitution campaigns failed? Are positions to be vacated and opportunities to be forcibly created via indiscriminate erasure so that affirmatized candidates can instead be gifted attainment, achievement and success? And how is the stability of any society, when no longer based on any context of either merit or contest, able to sustain itself, or even evolve, given Mankind’s propensity to corruption in the face of disproportionately held power? If power positions are affirmatively held, the corruptive cross-over will occur more quickly at at lower levels, thereby not only weakening society over all strata, but also in compromised leadership, unable to handle either responsibility or privilege.
for more on this & additional, relevant discourse, recommended listening: